| Job in Tashkent, resumes, vacancies. Search for jobs and personnel in Uzbekistan. |
|
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vacancies (14)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consultancy Opportunity for Final Evaluation in UzbekistanEmployer SFCG |
| Information on vacancy | |
| Period of publication | 14.08.2025 - 27.08.2025 |
| Field of activity / position: |
Research projects / Consultant |
| Duties | Context Search for Common Ground Search is an international non-profit organization that promotes the peaceful resolution of conflict. With headquarters in Washington, DC and Brussels, Belgium, Search's mission is to transform how individuals, organizations, and governments deal with conflict—away from adversarial approaches towards cooperative solutions. With more than 600 staff, Search implements projects in more than 30 countries across the globe. Search, which has been operating in Uzbekistan since 2022, works closely with key local actors across governments, development partners, civil society, religious actors and media to support peace building efforts, train professionals in conflict-sensitive reporting, increasing the capability of various actors and state authorities, and building strong regional bonds for increased collaboration and trust. Project Background ● Project Name: #YoshXabardor: Youth Against Corruption ● Country: Uzbekistan ● Project Goal: Strengthen the engagement of youth in government efforts to combat corruption in Uzbekistan, fostering collaboration between youth and government actors, and increasing the availability of resources and platforms that shed light on youth-led anti-corruption initiatives. ● Project Objectives: o To provide practical assistance in strengthening the understanding and capacity of local youth to detect and report against corruption. o To increase collaboration between target youth and national state entities on policy change and strengthening anti-corruption mechanisms. ● Theory of Change: IF youth have built capacity to better understand, detect, and report corruption cases without putting themselves at-risk, and IF youth and government actors are able to collaborate to promote anti-corruption mechanisms THEN an environment will be fostered whereby youth change agents will have increased agency to become drivers of anti-corruption, and youth at large are motivated and supported to address systemic loopholes in government efforts. ● Target Locations: Republic of Karakalpakstan, Jizzakh, and Kashkadarya regions. ● Target Group: Youth actors between the ages of 16-29. ● Key Activities: o Capacity-building program for youth change agents o Provision of small grants o Youth peer-to-peer learning exchange workshop o Open dialogue between youth change agents and government stakeholders Purpose of the Evaluation The purpose of this final evaluation is to: ● Assess the overall effectiveness and impact of the #YoshXabardor project in achieving its stated goals and objectives. ● Examine the project's relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability. ● Identify key lessons learned and best practices that can inform future anti-corruption initiatives in Uzbekistan and the region. ● Provide actionable and specific recommendations for the Anti-Corruption agency and other stakeholders to strengthen youth engagement in anti-corruption efforts. Evaluation Questions The evaluation will address the following key questions, aligned with the project's objectives and theory of change: 1. Relevance: a. To what extent was the project relevant to the needs and priorities of youth in the target regions regarding anti-corruption? b. To what extent local stakeholders valued this project and its interventions? c. How well did the project align with national anti-corruption strategies and policies in Uzbekistan? 2. Effectiveness: a. To what extent did the project achieve its stated objectives and expected results? b. How effective were the various project activities (A1.1-A1.4, A2.1-A2.3) in contributing to the achievement of project objectives? c. What were the key factors that contributed to or hindered the project's effectiveness? 3. Impact: a. What were the intended and unintended positive and negative impacts of the project on youth, government stakeholders, and the broader community? Or How did the project contribute to increased youth and government collaboration in combating corruption. Please cite clear examples with evidence. b. To what extent did the project contribute to creating a more enabling environment for youth engagement in anti-corruption efforts? OrHow did the project contribute to increasing access to resources and platforms for youth-led anticorruption activities?. c. How did the project contribute to addressing systemic loopholes in anti-corruption policy, processes and mechanisms? d. How did the project shift the role of youth towards anti corruption cause? Or How did the project contribute in enhancing youth agency in combating corruption? 4. Sustainability: a. To what extent are the project's results likely to be sustained after the project ends? b. What mechanisms have been put in place to ensure the sustainability of the project's achievements? Is there an exit plan for the project? c. How can local stakeholders be further empowered to sustain the project's impact? 5. Good practices and lesson learned a. What are the good practices that emerged from the project that worked quite well? What did not work well. b. What are the key lessons learned (positive and negative) from this project that can be useful for future initiatives? 6. Safeguarding indicators Group 1 – Indicator #1: % of participants who feel their voices and opinions are valued in the project Suggesting question to measure indicator: To what extent do you agree with this statement: I feel my voice and opinion are valued in the project (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) Group 2 – Indicator #2: % of participants who feel safe participating in the project/activities Suggesting question to measure indicator: On a scale from 1 to 5 (5= completely safe, 1 not at all safe), to what extent do you feel safe participating in the project? (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, prefer not to answer) Group 3 – Indicator #3: % of participants who are aware of reporting mechanisms Suggesting question to measure indicator: Are you aware of how to report any form of harm or concerns that you or someone else might have experienced related to your participation in the activity/project? (Yes, No, Prefer not to answer) Specific Questions Related to Project Objectives: ● SO1: o Did target Uzbekistani youth have increased awareness and knowledge of corruption and efforts to contend against corruption as a result of the project? (ER1.1) How is this evidenced? o Did target Uzbekistani youth have increased skills and agency to become champions of anti-corruption in a safe and constructive manner? (ER1.2) What specific skills were gained? ● SO2: o Did the project facilitate engagement between target youth and key government actors to strengthen anti-corruption mechanisms and address loopholes? (ER2.1) What was the quality of this engagement? o Are resources and platforms increasingly available to shed light and provide guidance on youth-led collaborative anti-corruption initiatives as a result of the project? (ER2.2) What is the reach and usage of these resources? Methodology and Data Collection Tools The evaluation should employ a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis techniques. The evaluation team should propose a detailed methodology in their proposal, including: 1. Desk Review: Review of project documents (proposal, progress reports, training materials, guidebook, baseline study, small grant reports, etc.): 2. Key Informant Interviews (KIIs): Interviews with project staff, partners (Yuksalish, ACA), government stakeholders, youth change agents, and other relevant stakeholders. 3. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs): Discussions with youth participants in the target regions to gather in-depth perspectives on their experiences and the project's impact. 4. Surveys: Quantitative surveys to assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among youth participants. 5. Case Studies: In-depth case studies of selected youth-led anti-corruption initiatives supported by the project. 6. Data Analysis: The evaluation team should clearly describe their approach to data analysis, including the use of statistical software (if applicable) and thematic analysis techniques for qualitative data. The methodology should be conflict-sensitive and ensure the safety and well-being of all participants. The evaluation team should also consider issues of gender equality and social inclusion in their data collection and analysis. Sampling Strategy: The consultant should propose a sampling strategy that ensures both breadth and depth of coverage across the geographic locations outlined. This strategy should be informed by the project's objectives and previous evaluations, with a focus on inclusivity and representativeness. The means of analysis, including statistical and thematic analysis techniques, should be justified based on the data collected and the outlined objectives of the study. Deliverables The evaluation team will be responsible for delivering the following: ● Inception Report (in English): A detailed inception report outlining the evaluation methodology, work plan, data collection instruments, and ethical considerations. ● Draft Evaluation Report: A comprehensive draft report presenting the evaluation findings, conclusions, and recommendations. ● Final Evaluation Report: A revised final report incorporating feedback from Search ILT team and other stakeholders. The final report should be no more than 40 pages (excluding annexes) and should include: o Executive Summary o Introduction and Background o Evaluation Methodology o Findings (organized by evaluation question) o Conclusions o Recommendations o Lessons Learned o Annexes (data collection instruments, list of interviewees, etc.) ● Presentation of Findings: A presentation of the key evaluation findings and recommendations to Search and other stakeholders. All deliverable documents should be prepared in English and translated into Russian language. Logistical Support Consultant(s) will be responsible for organizing their own logistics for data collection, including transportation to/from target regions, vehicles, fuel, drivers, accommodation, and venue rentals. These costs must be budgeted into the study. At least one Search and/or IP staff member may be available to support in arranging proper access/connection to project beneficiaries/participants. In addition, Search and partners will share the following elements with the external consultant(s): Background materials including the project proposal and logframe, M&E plan, baseline study, project periodic reports etc. Ethical Considerations Ensuring ethical standards throughout the evaluation process is essential to safeguarding the dignity and safety of all participants. The evaluation will prioritize Do No Harm and conflict sensitivity principles. This includes conducting a thorough contextual analysis to understand local dynamics and avoid exacerbating tensions within communities. Inclusion is a core value, and the study will actively seek diverse participation across gender, age, ethnicity, and religion, especially from marginalized groups. Informed consent will be a critical component, with participants receiving clear information about the study's purpose, procedures, and potential risks. Consent will be obtained in writing or verbally, ensuring participants understand their rights and can withdraw at any time without consequences. Confidentiality will be strictly maintained; identifiable information will be securely stored, and findings will be reported in a way that protects participants' anonymity. By adhering to these ethical practices, the evaluation aims to respect participants' rights while producing valuable insights for future initiatives. Data Quality Assurance and Management To ensure the integrity and quality of the data collected during the evaluation, a comprehensive review and management process will be implemented. All study data will be subject to multiple layers of review by both the country office and the global Institutional Learning Team before the final product is accepted. Review Processes: 1. Initial Data Review: Upon completion of data collection, preliminary analysis and validation will be conducted by the evaluation team to identify any inconsistencies or gaps in the data. 2. Country Office Review: The country office will conduct a thorough review of the findings, methodologies, and analytical approaches to ensure alignment with project objectives and contextual relevance. This review will occur prior to drafting the final report. 3. Institutional Learning Team Review: The penultimate version of the evaluation report will be submitted to the global Institutional Learning Team for additional oversight and feedback. This ensures that the evaluation meets established standards of quality and rigor. Timeline The Final Evaluation, encompassing desk study, field-based data collection, data analysis, and report writing, will be conducted over a total period of 45 days. This timeline is structured to ensure that all phases of the evaluation are completed efficiently. Activity Timeline: Activity Deadline 1. Application Announcement August 14, 2025 2. Application Deadline August 28, 2025 3. Signing of the Contract September 1, 2025 4. Submission of Inception Report September 14, 2025 5. Draft Report Submission September 30, 2025 6. Final Report Submission October 15, 2025 9. Budget The total budget available for this evaluation study is up to USD7,000 (Gross)(contract amount might be equiv. in UZS). Consultants are required to submit a detailed financial proposal that outlines all anticipated costs associated with the completion of the evaluation. This should include, but is not limited to, the following components: 1. Personnel Costs: a. Daily rates for all personnel involved in the evaluation, including the lead consultant and any support staff. 2. Data Collection Costs: a. Costs related to field-based data collection, including materials and resources for online surveys, focus group discussions (FGDs), and key informant interviews (KIIs). b. Specific costs should detail the expected number of participants surveyed, the number of sites for data collection, and any logistical expenses associated with conducting these activities, such as transportation, accommodation, and venue rentals, should be included. 3. Data Analysis: a. Expenses associated with data management, statistical analysis, and qualitative analysis. 4. Production of Deliverables: a. Costs related to the preparation and distribution of the final report and any interim reports, including design and printing if necessary. Consultants should provide a clear and itemized budget that reflects their understanding of the project requirements and the value of their services while remaining within the allocated budget. Proposals will be evaluated not only on the technical merit of the evaluation plan but also on the financial soundness of the budget presented. Payment Schedule The schedule for the payment of the consultancy fee is structured as follows: 1. Initial Payment: o 50% of the total consultancy fee will be paid upon the approval of the Inception Report and implementation plan. This initial payment will facilitate the commencement of data collection and analysis. 2. Final Payment: o The remaining 50% will be paid upon the completion and approval of the final report, which should be submitted in both English and Russian. The release of this second installment will be contingent upon the report's approval by the Evidence and Learning Team (ELT). |
| Requirements to the candidate | |
| Age: | 30-70 |
| Gender: | Irrelevant |
| Residence: | Uzbekistan |
| Education: | Higher |
| Professional requirements | Requirements of Consultant The following skills and experience are expected by Search for our evaluator for this project: ● Proficiency in English and Russian / Uzbek languages (written and spoken); ● At least 5 years of experience in doing research and baseline studies including collecting data in interviews, surveys and focus groups in Central Asia, particularly in Uzbekistan and/or outside; ● Ability to work with state and non-state sectors; ● Experience conducting quantitative surveys and analysis; ● Evaluation methods and data collection skills; ● Understanding of conflict sensitivity especially with respect to gender, cultural and religious sensitivity. Selection Criteria Technical proposals will have 70% weight, while financial proposals will have 30% weight during the proposal assessment process. The Final Evaluation proposal should outline: ● A Final Evaluation design, the main concepts will be taken for further work ● The chosen methodology and an explanation for why it was selected, including an initial toolkit that will be used through the study; ● Brief analytical framework ● Anticipated risks for this research, particularly from a Conflict Sensitivity and Do No Harm perspective; ● A description of the applicant's experience and its relevance to this evaluation; ● One writing sample of evaluations carried out by the team in the last 3 years. ● A well explained and fully itemized budget proposed for this study. Consultant proposals will be selected for interview based on: 1. The quality of the technical proposal submitted: knowhow of the subject matter, Relevance of proposed methodology to the goal, objectives, and research questions for the project, Quality of proposed methods, presentation of analytical approach conflict sensitivity approaches, and quality control measures, academic qualification and professional experiences of the proposal team members, team combination 2. Quality of the writing sample and its relevance to the assignment in concern 3. Performance in the interview: Presentation ideas, ability to clarify questions raised from the proposal, explanation of the field data collection team formation and explanation of explanation quality assurance approach. 4. Budget proposed in the financial proposal: Justification of the rate and no of team members proposed, total amount proposed in relation to proposed methodology, deliverables and team and balance between HR budget and other field related costs Applications To apply, interested applicants who fit the requirements should apply in English to uzbekistan@sfcg.org not later than COB August 28, 2025. Applications should include: Note: Only the following documents should be submitted (no additional documents will be reviewed): ● The technical and financial proposals combined ● Curriculum vitae and cover letter (1 page) ● One example of a past evaluation. |
| Working conditions | |
| Region | Uzbekistan |
| Employment | Part-time |
| Salary offered | Indicated above |
| Additional information | |
| Additional information: | For more information: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1josZJBMZyu5zYxXGOgzUhnozwZC1_o81/view?usp=sharing |
 |
Personal account |
| About the project User Agreement Public offer |
Price List How to pay? Contact |
Manuals for HR officers Publications |